Script Draft: Is Barrett Really Worth It?

Intro music

Emily Robertson:  Since its opening in 1988, Barrett, The Honors College has provided thousands of students each year with specialized classes and separate living spaces than the rest of the Arizona State University campus. Barrett students have to pay an exceptionally larger amount of money than the rest of the students at the university. Honors college students should realize that despite the fact that they receive special treatment, the extra money being poured into the school is not worth the money.

As far as residential benefits go, Barrett students have it made. The rooms come with bigger bathrooms, they get higher quality food, and they have their own rec center. These are undoubtedly the biggest areas the money is going towards. But the fact is that the students at Arizona State University stand divided. Interestingly enough, the two students living at home or in other residence halls look into the negatives of being in the honors college while the two inside perspectives stand divided.

Danika Orcilla: I live at home, but I think I have a good understanding of how student housing works on campus. I feel like students pay their way into Barrett. Anyone can get into it and say they are part of it but not really uphold the true meaning of being in an honors college. Students in Barrett are automatically thought of as being smarter than a student not in Barrett, so it is more of an image they use to their advantage. It separates the students in the honors college from the normal students to the point where they have to take separate classes, so they don’t really get the true college experience. It is similar to the strategies elementary schools use with reading groups where everyone knows who is in the higher levels versus the lower. It is a form of academic segregation. Not only is Barrett segregated academically, but also segregated physically, because they have their own gated off community that is secluded from the “average” students dormitory. Barrett kids eat, sleep, and essentially live with their equals instead of interacting with a mixture of types of people.

Emily Robertson: From an inside perspective, do you feel the same way?

Arianna Bradley: I think it is worth it in some respects like priority registration for classes each semester and my human event and honors classes, but the overcharging for the facilities that I use are not worth the price due to their quality. For instance the dorms in Barrett are not that different compared to other residence halls. I still share a bathroom with three other people just like hassayampa. We also have lounges and community kitchens just like the other halls as well. As far as the education goes I think Barrett could not be more worth it. I find my Human Events class is extremely useful and personal. I also think my cluster of people I am in multiple classes with has helped me too. I have gotten to form study groups with them because I know we are all learning the same thing, and since we all live in the same community I believe it is extremely beneficial to live in Barrett.

Emily Robertson: So you are split with if you think it is worth it or not?

Arianna Bradley: I’d say so. I think it is just a matter of opinion. I know I do not want to live in the Barrett dorms again next year, and I don’t like how they try to keep you here for longer than freshman year. Looking back, I am glad I applied, but I don’t think it is completely worth everything I am putting into it.

Emily Robertson: Isabel, Looking solely at residence halls, do you feel your money going to Barrett is benefitting you?

Isabel Anderson: It is absolutely worth it. In my opinion, we aren’t that different than the kids living in any other residence halls. The students in San Pablo or Best hall are probably just as close as we are in our halls. My friends are always coming over to Barrett too; I don’t think they would if it were just the same as Hassayampa. The food is better because we pay more, so we deserve higher quality food. I chose to apply here because I thought it would be a better environment for me to focus on school and it feels like that is true so far. The people in my classes all know what it takes to be an honors student, so it’s nice to have similar people to you with common goals around.

Emily Robertson: What about education?

Isabel Anderson: Not as worth it as the housing. Yes, I get to eat better but that isn’t really a huge factor on whether or not I need to pay more tuition. My professors are as great as the others and people outside of Barrett have my major and are taking some of the same classes as me.

Emily Robertson: So by living in Hassayampa do you think it is worth it to pay additional tuition to be in Barrett?

Brianna Quintero: It is hard to say that paying that money would be worth it because I already feel like I am getting everything I need to succeed without being an honors student. Being a Biochemistry major, I already feel as though my classes are challenging enough without piling a thesis onto it or a Human Events class. My professors are just as good as the other ones and the people I live around are willing to form study groups as well. I live in Hassayampa. The food is decent, along with things like the student rec center. I feel like having to live like everyone else is a part of the whole experience of being here. We always heard of stories about college growing up and I think that their experience is completely different than mine or anyone’s that is not in Barrett.

Emily Robertson: The general consensus is that it is only worth paying extra money for partial benefits. Other than that, Barrett really is not that different from the typical college student’s lifestyle. This shows that despite the fact that they get special treatment, The Honors College is not all it’s cracked up to be.

Outro music

ASU Reacts: What Earthquakes Can Teach Us About Elections

Emily Robertson: New research shows that presidential election outcomes can be determined the same way scientists predict earthquakes. When the country is in upheaval, it is likely that the country will chose the new candidate. On the opposite side, when everything is stable, the one in power tends to remain in power. Where there is stability, there is no earthquake. These studies were sure to get interesting reactions, so I talked to a fellow student of Arizona State University, Brianna Quintero, and here is what she had to say.

Emily Robertson: Were you surprised when you heard that these two subjects could be related?

Brianna Quintero: Yes, I thought it was interesting because we usually don’t hear those two subjects being compared to each other.

Emily Robertson: Do you think this method will work during the next election?

Brianna Quintero: I don’t see how this method could work because President Obama will have already completed his second term. How will geophysicists be able to measure the stability of the country when there will be two new candidates?

Emily Robertson: is it possible that this way of thinking was really scientific, or could it have been by chance that he predicted this?

Brianna Quintero: I fell like it was a lucky guess, although this method does seem to make sense.

Emily Robertson: Brianna brought up thought-provoking points, such as the election happening in four years. It is difficult to say how this method will contribute to the years to come. I feel that a lot of people would come to the same conclusion, feeling that this is chance. Although this method may not be foolproof, it is interesting to see new ways to predict the future leaders of the country. 

Genre Analysis: What Earthquakes can Teach us About Elections

-->

I listened to a story entitled, "What Earthquakes can Teach us About Elections". This title grabbed my attention because the two topics were things I would have never associated with each other. I feel as though every title should have something to draw focus to that story rather than the ones it is posted next to, and I think this story did a very good job at that.  Timing is also important because if there is a trend in what people want to see, it will be more likely that that story will be viewed opposed to others. This story also came out at a popular time considering the elections were being held that week.

This story began by introducing the topic briefly, so they didn’t lose listeners due to boredom, and they put in another attention grabber: “A blogger for The New York Times was fiercely criticized during the campaign for forecasting overwhelming odds of President Obama’s reelection.” Instantly the listeners want to know the facts that this man has to back up his bold statement.  This story then goes on to talk about how people can and have been predicting election turn outs without even looking at statistics. A man then comes on and mentions that he spoke with one of the self proclaimed experts. The next part was a really good idea in my opinion. The way it was formatted was so he could play an older conversation about the topic without having that person live and in the studio. He introduced it by saying that he had a conversation with the man last week and that he wanted to play part of the conversation. It flowed well, and made perfect sense as to why they were using it.

The following part of the story is where the earthquake aspect of the title comes into play and where everything begins to connect. Yet another person is brought up in this conversation. This time it is a geophysicist that happened to be explaining the science behind earthquakes. He said to think of politics in terms of earthquakes rather than conservative versus liberal. Again, this leaves the listener wondering what the speaker means. Eventually, the point they wanted to get across was that elections could be determined by stability versus upheaval. If there is no scandal or big event that happens, the country remains with its stability, therefore keeping the president the same.

Something I was surprised this story did not have that many others did was the intro/outro music. I think it gives a more polished and professional feel when done correctly.  They also used two people as the focus of the interview, but brought in clips of other conversations to tie into the story. That was the part I liked the best considering I would not have thought to do it on my own. 

http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2012/11/09/164711093/what-earthquakes-can-teach-us-about-elections

For my story I was planning on talking about students in Barrett. They get the better food, separate gym, bigger bathrooms, etc, and they also get a lot of fun poked at them for living there. I think it would be interesting to see their take on things opposed to someone who lives in another residence hall.

Project 2 Reflection: Accomplished

This project went well for me in my opinion. Compared to Project 1, I felt more confident that I could finish this project knowing I fulfilled the requirements as best I could. I think I crafted a good argument, especially compared to last time because my ultimate personal goal is to improve with each new thing I write. Project one was a struggle for me, in fact I think I even titled it with that word, but this time around I knew what I wanted the end result to be, so I wrote with a purpose this time.

The thing I think I did well was incorporating sources. I wanted to have a balance of educational sources and in-person ones. By living around my topic every day, it was fairly easy to do so. The quotes were definitely easier to incorporate into my paper while I had to come up with new things to say about my educational ones. In the end I do feel like it was a strong-suit of mine though. Also, I think the grammar side of writing is something I don't tend to really struggle with either. On the opposite end of the spectrum, there were a few things I could probably have improved on. One being bringing criteria to the foregrounds and making it obvious. I feel like I still don't have a clear vision of what that really means. Also, I wish that all of my visuals were my own. I think I could have given this project more of a personal look at sorority life if I had done that.

I learned that despite the fact that I learned a lot from project one, I still could stand to improve on many aspects of my writing. I also learned that I could benefit from attending more workshops. The one on how to make an interactive map was the only way I was able to accomplish this project, so I can see how going to more of them will be beneficial in the future. Outside of this class I can see myself using the skills I have developed thus far in other classes and in my job once I graduate. Being a communications major, I will constantly be writing and having to use things such as professional rhetoric, along with being able to get my point across concisely and quickly.

For the next big assignment I think I will go to more workshops and get more people to peer edit my work so I can have multiple views at once. To me, peer review is one of the most important steps in the writing process because it is the audience that is critiquing my work. I think this project gave me new skills to use in the future as well as strengthened the skills I already had.